English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 852768      Online Users : 306
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/10121


    Title: Application of risk adjusted cost-effectiveness analyses for stroke treatment
    Authors: Chen, RC;Lang, H;Chuang, S
    Contributors: Division of Health Services and Preventive Medicine
    Abstract: Objectives: This research aimed to develop the risk adjusted cost-effectiveness (RAC-E) model that used routinely collected data to compare acute hospital services for stroke patients admitted to the main public hospitals. Methods: Data sourced from routinely collected National Health Insurance Research claim Dataset (1997-2010). Patient cohort was defined by the ICD codes 430-438. Adverse events (AE) indicated by all-cause readmission or mortality after the index stroke. Univariate and multivariate associations between baseline characteristics and AE were assessed by chi-square tests and multiple Cox proportional hazards (Cox-PH) model. Survival curves adjusting for covariates were plotted for comparison of cumulative probability of AE. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed by comparing the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) which adjusted all the socioeconomic status and type of co-morbidities. Results: With reference to hospital 0, hospital 1 was associated with a higher risk of incident adverse outcome, especially in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) (HR 1.63, p= 0.01; OR 1.94, p< 0.01) and cerebral infarction (CI) (HR 1.72, p< 0.0001; OR 1.97, p< 0.0001). After adjusting for age, gender and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores, admission to Hospital 1 remained associating with increased AE risk in ICH (HR 1.48, p< 0.05; OR 1.80, p< 0.05) and CI (HR 1.61, p< 0.001; OR 1.80, p< 0.001). Our cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that Hospital 0 compared with Hospital 1 was considered to be a more cost-saving hospital at the incremental cost of 167,460 NTD for preventing one Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), 19,947 NTD for preventing one ICH. Moreover, hospital 0 was more costeffective than hospital 1 with an additional cost of 10,444 NTD for preventing one CI and 69,240 NTD for preventing one transient ischemic attack or other unspecified cerebrovascular disease (TIA). ConClusions: Overall, the present analysis indicated Hospital 0 performed better and may be a more cost-effective hospital for the care of stroke patients.
    Date: 2016-11
    Relation: Value in Health. 2016 Nov;19(7):A653.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.1765
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1098-3015&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000396606301853
    Appears in Collections:[莊紹源] 會議論文/會議摘要

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    SDO109830151633131X.pdf60KbAdobe PDF351View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback