English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 909604      Online Users : 825
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/10331


    Title: Comparative clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with resected buccal and tongue squamous cell carcinomas
    Authors: Liao, CT;Wen, YW;Yang, LY;Lee, SR;Ng, SH;Liu, TW;Tsai, ST;Tsai, MH;Lin, JC;Chen, PR;Lou, PJ;Wang, CP;Chu, PY;Hwang, TZ;Leu, YS;Tsai, KY;Terng, SD;Chen, TM;Wang, CH;Chien, CY;Chen, WC;Lee, LY;Lin, CY;Wang, HM;Hsieh, CH;Tsao, CK;Fang, TJ;Huang, SF;Kang, CJ;Chang, KP;Yen, TC
    Contributors: National Institute of Cancer Research
    Abstract: Objectives Although patients with buccal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) usually show acceptable outcomes, local control and survival rates are generally lower than those observed for tongue SCC. This study was designed to compare the clinical outcomes of Taiwanese patients with these two common oral cavity malignancies. Methods Patients with first primary buccal or tongue SCC who were included in the Taiwanese Cancer Registry Database between 2004 and 2012 were eligible. The study sample consisted of 16,379 patients (7870 buccal SCC and 8509 tongue SCC) who received surgery with or without adjuvant therapy. The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS) rates served as the outcome measures. Results Compared with tongue SCC, patients with buccal SCC had a higher prevalence of males (95.7% vs. 86.4%, p < 0.0001), pT4 disease (21.4% vs. 12.7%, p < 0.0001), and p-Stage IV (30.4% vs. 24.8%, p < 0.0001) but a lower frequency of pN2 disease (15.2% vs. 18.5%, p < 0.0001). The 5-year DSS and OS rates of buccal SCC patients were slightly higher than those of tongue SCC (78% vs. 77%, p = 0.0297; and 71% vs. 69%, p = 0.0231, respectively). Multivariate analysis identified tumor site (tongue vs. buccal SCC), sex (male vs. female), age (≥65 vs. <65 years), pT classification (T4/T3/T2 vs. T1), and pN classification (N3/N2/N1 vs. N0) as independent prognostic factors in the entire study cohort. Conclusions The survival advantage of buccal SCC over tongue SCC appears significant in large clinical samples, despite a higher prevalence of p-Stage IV disease in the former.
    Date: 2017-04
    Relation: Oral Oncology. 2017 Apr;67:95-102.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.02.011
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1368-8375&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000397953800015
    Cited Times(Scopus): http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85013141413
    Appears in Collections:[劉滄梧] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    SCP85013141413.pdf1147KbAdobe PDF412View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback