國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/10497
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 12145/12927 (94%)
造访人次 : 916670      在线人数 : 1489
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧:
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号",以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻,建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段,可获得较完整数据
  • 进阶搜寻
    主页登入上传说明关于NHRI管理 到手机版


    jsp.display-item.identifier=請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/10497


    题名: Roles of ramR and tet(A) mutations in conferring tigecycline resistance in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates
    作者: Chiu, SK;Huang, LY;Chen, H;Tsai, YK;Liou, CH;Lin, JC;Siu, LK;Chang, FY;Yeh, KM
    贡献者: Division of Infectious Diseases
    摘要: Tigecycline is regarded as a last-resort treatment for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections, but increasing numbers of tigecycline-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates have been reported. Tigecycline resistance mechanisms are underdetermined in CRKP. This study aimed to elucidate mechanisms underlying tigecycline resistance in 16 tigecycline- and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (TCRKP) isolates. Mutations in tigecycline resistance determinant genes (ramR, acrR, oqxR, tet(A), tet(L), tet(X), tet(M), rpsJ) were assessed by PCR amplicon sequencing, and mutations in ramR and tet(A) exhibited high prevalences individually (81%) and in combination (63%). Eight functional ramR mutation profiles reducing tigecycline sensitivity were verified by plasmid complementation of wild-type and mutant ramR Using a site-specific mutant, the most frequent RamR mutation, A19V (60%), had no significant effect on tigecycline susceptibility and upregulation of ramA and acrA Two tet(A) variants with double frameshift mutations, Type 1 and Type 2, were identified; Type 2 tet(A) is novel. Parent strain transformed with a plasmid carrying Type 1 or Type 2 tet(A) increased tigecycline MIC by 8-fold or 4-fold, respectively. Synergistic effects were observed in strains harboring deficient ramR and mutated tet(A), with an 8-fold increase in tigecycline MIC compared with strains harboring only mutated tet(A). Overall, mutations in the ramR and tet(A) efflux genes constituted the major tigecycline resistance mechanisms among the studied TCRKP isolates. The identification of strains exhibiting the combination of deficient ramR and widespread mutated tet(A) is concerning due to the possible dissemination of increased tigecycline resistance in K. pneumoniae.
    日期: 2017-08
    關聯: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2017 Aug;61(8):Article number e00391-17.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aac.00391-17
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0066-4804&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000406259400043
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85026376056
    显示于类别:[蕭樑基] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    PUB28533243.pdf219KbAdobe PDF342检视/开启


    在NHRI中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

    TAIR相关文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈