國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/11307
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 910193      Online Users : 809
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/11307


    Title: Intraarticular injection for rabbit knee osteoarthritis: Effectiveness among hyaluronic acid, platelet-rich plasma, and mesenchymal stem cells
    Authors: Chen, YC;Hsu, YM;Tan, KP;Fang, HW;Chang, CH
    Contributors: Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Nanomedicine
    Abstract: Both hyaluronic acid (HA) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection are the common prescribed treatments for osteoarthritis (OA) patients. HA can serve as a good lubricant to reduce the fraction force of cartilage surface while PRP provide several growth factors to assist tissue repair. Considering the efficiency of tissue regeneration, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) injections becomes an attractive method because of their self-renewal and multi-differentiation potential. Thus, in the study, we compared the treatment effect of PRP and HA with/without MSCs. Eighteen rabbits underwent anterior cruciate ligament transection for OA knee induction, and then injected with saline, PRP, HA, HA+PRP, PRP+MSCs or HA+MSCs intraarticularly for treatment effect evaluation. Compared with the results of HA group, the cartilage treated with HA+PRP and PRP+MSCs showed better repair results in micromorphology and glycosaminoglycan synthesis. We also found that the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OASRI) scores in HA+PRP and PRP+MSC groups were significant lower than that of the others at month 1 and month 3, separately. This indicates that the combination of HA and PRP could provide short-term tissue protection effect while PRP and MSC could provide a long-term tissue regeneration effect. PRP+MSC could be considered as a promising biological method for OA treatment.
    Date: 2018-10
    Relation: Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers. 2018 Oct;91:138-145.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2018.05.051
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1876-1070&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000447482400013
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85049571316
    Appears in Collections:[Others] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    SCP85049571316.pdf2516KbAdobe PDF331View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback