English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 12340/13512 (91%)
造訪人次 : 2254929      線上人數 : 227
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於NHRI管理 到手機版
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/12759


    題名: Survival impacts of different nodal characteristics and T-classification in N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients
    作者: Lin, TY;Lan, MY;Tsou, HH;Ho, CY;Twu, CW;Liu, YC;Lin, PJ;Huang, PI;Shiau, CY;Lin, JC
    貢獻者: Institute of Population Health Sciences
    摘要: Objectives: We investigated the survival impacts of various nodal characteristics and T-classification on nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with the 8th AJCC/UICC staging criteria N3. Materials and methods: Pretreatment MRIs from 110 staged N3 NPC patients were reviewed. There were 23 T1, 25 T2, 32 T3, and 30 T4, respectively. All except one patient belonged to WHO type II pathology. All patients received curative radiotherapy 68.0–76.8 Gy plus different chemotherapy, including induction, concurrent, adjuvant or any combination. Various endpoints, including OS (overall survival), DFS (disease-free survival), LRFFS (locoregional failure-free survival), DMFFS (distant metastasis failure-free survival) were compared between different nodal characteristics and T-classification. Results: There were no statistically significant differences in all analyzed survival curves between various nodal characteristics, including unilateral N3 vs. bilateral N3, “large” nodes (>6 cm) alone vs. “low” nodes (below the caudal border of cricoid cartilage) alone vs. combined “large” and “low” nodes, risk score 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 vs. 4 (by counting the sum of “large” and “low” nodes in the same case), and radiologic extra-nodal extension. Patients with T4, compared with those of T1-3 have worse OS (5-year rates, 42.2% vs. 82.8%, P < 0.0001), DFS (5-year rates, 43.9% vs. 68.9%, P = 0.0037), LRFFS (5-year rates, 69.3% vs. 82.7%, P = 0.0432), and DMFFS (5-year rates, 57.2% vs. 77.7%, P = 0.0163). Conclusions: Our results support merging previous N3a and N3b as a N3 category in the 8th edition new staging system. Patients with T4N3 diseases have extremely poor outcome and deserve to strengthen the treatment intensity in future trials.
    日期: 2020-09
    關聯: Oral Oncology. 2020 Sep;108:Article number 104820.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104820
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1368-8375&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000566724700015
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85086118381
    顯示於類別:[鄒小蕙] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    SCP85086118381.pdf3351KbAdobe PDF414檢視/開啟


    在NHRI中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋