English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 854069      Online Users : 1451
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/15154


    Title: Systematic review of precision subclassification of type 2 diabetes
    Authors: Misra, S;Wagner, R;Ozkan, B;Schön, M;Sevilla-Gonzalez, M;Prystupa, K;Wang, CC;Kreienkamp, RJ;Cromer, SJ;Rooney, MR;Duan, D;Thuesen, ACB;Wallace, AS;Leong, A;Deutsch, AJ;Andersen, MK;Billings, LK;Eckel, RH;Sheu, WH;Hansen, T;Stefan, N;Goodarzi, MO;Ray, D;Selvin, E;Florez, JC;Meigs, JB;Udler, MS
    Contributors: Institute of Molecular and Genomic Medicine
    Abstract: Heterogeneity in type 2 diabetes presentation, progression and treatment has the potential for precision medicine interventions that can enhance care and outcomes for affected individuals. We undertook a systematic review to ascertain whether strategies to subclassify type 2 diabetes are associated with improved clinical outcomes, show reproducibility and have high quality evidence. We reviewed publications that deployed ‘simple subclassification’ using clinical features, biomarkers, imaging or other routinely available parameters or ‘complex subclassification’ approaches that used machine learning and/or genomic data. We found that simple stratification approaches, for example, stratification based on age, body mass index or lipid profiles, had been widely used, but no strategy had been replicated and many lacked association with meaningful outcomes. Complex stratification using clustering of simple clinical data with and without genetic data did show reproducible subtypes of diabetes that had been associated with outcomes such as cardiovascular disease and/or mortality. Both approaches require a higher grade of evidence but support the premise that type 2 diabetes can be subclassified into meaningful groups. More studies are needed to test these subclassifications in more diverse ancestries and prove that they are amenable to interventions.Competing Interest StatementAll authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; SM has investigator initiated funding from DexCom and serves on the Board of Trustees for the Diabetes Research & Wellness Foundation (UK); RW declares lecture fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi and Eli Lilly. He served on an advisory board for Akcea Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and NovoNordisk; SJC reports a close family member employed by a Johnson & Johnson company; RHS reports fees from Novo Nordisk and Amgen; LKB has received consulting honoraria from Bayer, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Lilly, and Xeris; WHHS reported as Advisor and/or Speaker for AstraZeneca, Bayer HealthCare, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals., Daiichi-Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; MG has served on an advisory board for Nestle Health Science; ES is a Deputy Editor of Diabetes Care and a member of the editorial board of Diabetologia and receives payments from Wolters Kluwer for chapters and laboratory monographs in UpToDate on measurements of glycemic control and screening tests for type 2 diabetes; JCF has received speaking honoraria from AstraZeneca and Novo Nordisk for scientific talks over which he had full control of content; JM reports Academic Associate for Quest Inc. Diagnostics R & D; MU reports an unpaid collaborator with AstraZeneca. All other authors have no disclosures.Funding StatementNo specific funding was received to undertake this body of work.Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.YesThe details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:This is a systematic review of published manuscripts and all data are available in the manuscripts included in this analysis. No additional data was sought.I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.YesI understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study repor ed in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).YesI have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.YesAll data produced in the present work are contained in the manuscript
    Date: 2023-04-23
    Relation: medRxiv. 2023; Article in Press.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.19.23288577
    Appears in Collections:[許惠恒] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    NMG2023071101.pdf876KbAdobe PDF86View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback