國家衛生研究院 NHRI:Item 3990099045/1545
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 926099      Online Users : 568
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/1545


    Title: National food fortification: a dialogue with reference to Asia: policy in evolution
    Authors: Wahlqvist, ML
    Contributors: Center for Health Policy Research and Development
    Abstract: Food fortification generally refers to the addition of micronutrients and other favourably bio-active food compnents to food-stuffs where there are recognised deficiencies in the target population. Each forticant has had or could have regulatory implications. It is understandable, although arguable, in the face of a limited food supply skewed, for the majority, in the direction of starchy staples of low essential nutrient density. Efforts, with plant breeding, to biofortify such foods are underway and likely to be safer, more sustainable and affordable than chemical additions. Unfortunately, with an increasingly refined and naturally tasteless food supply (salty, fatty, sugary and starchy), and where energy requirements are falling because of physical inactivity, micronutrient fortification is being used as a nutritional 'fix-it' strategy. In Asia, there are several critical micro- nutrients. No one national fortification program can deal with all deficiencies is likely to be highly selective for the nutrients which have the greatest advocacy or are most recognisable. They also leave the other health promoting food properties like intactness, nutrient spectrum, and phytonutrient content un-addressed. A variety of foodstuffs, with different biological origins, is the preferred approach. Where an optimal food system is not in place, there may be justification for fortification if thereis regular monitoring and surveillance of the food supply and health outcomes occurs; is a clear cost-risk-benefit advantage in such a strategy; are programs in place to improve the nutritional value of the basic food supply and is an 'exit strategy' for the fortification program.
    Keywords: Nutrition & Dietetics
    Date: 2008
    Relation: Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2008;17(Suppl. 1):24-29.
    Link to: http://apjcn.nhri.org.tw/server/APJCN/Volume17/vol17suppl.1/abstracts.php
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0964-7058&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000254987900007
    Cited Times(Scopus): http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=46049117561
    Appears in Collections:[MARK LAWRENCE WAHLQVIST(2008-2012)] Conference Papers/Meeting Abstract

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    000254987900007.pdf297KbAdobe PDF819View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback