English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 909989      Online Users : 778
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/4633


    Title: Pharmacoeconomic analysis of capecitabine in adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer in Taiwan
    Authors: Hsu, TC;Chen, HH;Chen, LT;Changchien, CR;Liu, MC;Wang, HM;Yang, L
    Contributors: National Institute of Cancer Research
    Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Colorectal cancer is the second most commonlydiagnosed cancer and the third cause of cancer-related mortalityin Taiwan. Capecitabine, an oral fluoropyrimidine, is an effec-tive alternative to intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin (5-FU/LV) in adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer. Theobjective of this pharmacoeconomic analysis is to access the cost-effectiveness of capecitabine compared to 5-FU/LV in the adju-vant setting in Taiwan from the payer’s [Bureau of NationalHealth Insurance (BNHI)] perspective. METHODS: A state-transition economic model was developed to estimate incremen-tal cost impact and the effectiveness in terms of quality-adjustedlife months (QALMs). Clinical outcomes and medical resourceutilization were collected during the phase III X-ACT study.Direct medical costs associated with chemotherapy drugs, physi-cian consultations, and adverse events (AEs) management werebased on Taiwan’s National Health Insurance fee schedule. Intra-venous chemotherapy administration costs and post-treatmentcosts were estimated from an expert panel survey conductedamong 12 colorectal surgeons and medical oncologists. Health-related utility scores were obtained from published literature.Outcomes and future costs were discounted at 1.5% and 6%respectively. Sensitivity analyses were performed on key modelparameters. RESULTS: Administration of capecitabine requiredfewer physician visits per patient (7.4 versus 28.0 with 5-FU/LV).Drug acquisition costs of capecitabine were higher than 5-FU/LV,however, these cost increments were offset by the chemotherapyadministration cost of 5-FU/LV. In addition, more expensivemedications and longer hospitalization were needed to manage5-FU/LV-related AEs. As a result, capecitabine demonstrated asignificant overall cost savings of $104,546 NTD. Over a life-time, the survival benefit for capecitabine extends to 9 QALMs.Capecitabine remained dominant under sensitivity testing. CON-CLUSION: From a Taiwan BNHI perspective, this pharma-coeconomic analysis showed that the use of capecitabine inadjuvant treatment of colon cancer would not only save directmedical costs but also improve health outcomes compared to 5-FU/LV.
    Date: 2007-05
    Relation: Value in Health. 2007 May-Jun;10(3):A11-A12.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1098-3015(10)68567-1
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1098-3015&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000246714800042
    Appears in Collections:[陳立宗] 會議論文/會議摘要

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    ISI000246714800042.pdf86KbAdobe PDF237View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback