English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12340/13424 (92%)
Visitors : 2000378      Online Users : 193
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/6652


    Title: Epidemiology and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in Taiwan: A multicenter study
    Authors: Pan, SC;Wang, JT;Lauderdale, TL;Ko, WC;Chen, YS;Liu, JW;Lau, YJ;Wang, LH;Liu, KS;Liao, CH;Lin, SY;Hu, BS;Chang, SC
    Contributors: Division of Infectious Diseases
    Abstract: Background/Purpose: After community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) was identified, new community-onset, healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA-CO) infections have been noticed as MRSA infection in patients with community-onset infection who have underlying conditions resulting in frequent exposure to the healthcare system. However, previous studies have not thoroughly investigated whether HA-MRSA-CO has characteristics resembling those of CA-MRSA or hospital-onset, healthcare-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA-HO) infection. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective study was conducted to analyze the clinical and microbiological data of patients with clinical isolates of MRSA from nine hospitals in Taiwan. Results: In total, 203 patients with MRSA isolates, including 27 patients with CA-MRSA (13.3%), 59 with HA-MRSA-CO (29.1%), and 117 with HA-MRSA-HO (57.6%), were studied. Compared to HA-MRSA-HO isolates, the CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA-CO isolates were associated with a higher proportion of skin and soft tissue infections (81.8% and 65.3% vs. 40.5%, p = 0.001 and p = 0.002) as well as lesser rate of resistance to ciprofloxacin (33.3% and 50.9% vs. 74.4%, p < 0.001 and p = 0.002), gentamicin (44.4% and 64.4% vs. 84.6%, p < 0.001 and p = 0.002), and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (33.3% and 42.4% vs. 58.1%, p = 0.02 and p = 0.048), and a lower 30-day all-cause mortality rate (7.4% and 0% vs. 20.9%, p < 0.001). Most of the CA-MRSA isolates were classified as staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type VT (11/27, 40.7%), whereas most HA-MRSA-HO isolates were classified as SCCmec type III (66/117, 56.4%). Conclusion: The CA-MRSA, HA-MRSA-CO, and HA-MRSA-HO clinical isolates significantly differed in their clinical presentations and molecular characteristics.
    Date: 2014-07
    Relation: Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2014 Jul;113(7):409-416.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2012.05.012
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0929-6646&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000339088000003
    Cited Times(Scopus): http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84902796979
    Appears in Collections:[楊采菱] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    ISI000339088000003.pdf251KbAdobe PDF980View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback