English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 12500/13673 (91%)
造訪人次 : 2826094      線上人數 : 326
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    主頁登入上傳說明關於NHRI管理 到手機版
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/9958


    題名: Effects of nal-IRI (MM-398) +/- 5-fluorouracil on quality of life (QoL) in NAPOLI-1: A phase 3 study in patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) previously treated with gemcitabine
    作者: Hubner, R;Cubillo, A;Blanc, JF;Melisi, D;Von Hoff, D;Wang-Gillam, A;Chen, LT;Becker, C;Mamlouk, K;Belanger, B;Yang, Y;De Jong, F;Siveke, J
    貢獻者: National Institute of Cancer Research
    摘要: Introduction: Patients with mPDAC frequently experience a significant symptom burden. This in turn negatively impacts their QoL. Nal-IRI, a nanoliposomal formulation of irinotecan, was evaluated with or without 5-FU/LV vs 5-FU/LV in a randomized phase 3 study in patients with mPDAC previously treated with gemcitabine-based therapy (NAPOLI-1). Results showed nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV significantly improved overall survival compared with 5-FU/LV (6.1 vs 4.2 months; unstratified hazard ratio 0.67; P = 0.012) (Wang-Gillam et al., Lancet. 2016). QoL was a secondary endpoint of the study.Methods: QoL was assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality-of-life core questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30), which includes functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social); symptom scales (appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, dyspnea, fatigue, insomnia, nausea and vomiting, and pain); and a global health and quality-of-life scale. Patients were to complete the questionnaire at treatment start, every 6 weeks, and 30 days post-follow-up visit. The population analyzed included all patients who provided baseline and at ≥1 subsequent EORTC-QLQ-C30 assessment. Linear transformations were applied to the raw scores to produce reported scores in the 0-100 range. In the responder analysis, patients were classified as improved (≥10% increase in scale of breadth at a post-baseline time point and remained above baseline for ≥6 weeks), worsened (did not meet improvement criteria and died, or had ≥10% decrease from baseline in scale of breadth at a post-baseline time point), or stable (did not meet criteria for improvement or worsening) for each subscale. Pairwise treatment group comparisons on response classification were performed for each subscale using Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel testing adjusted for multiplicity with a Benjamini-Hochberg correction to control false discovery rate at 0.05 level for the 15 comparisons.Results: A total of 154 patients (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV, n = 71; 5-FU/LV, n = 83) comprised the population for this analysis of which 69% (49/71) of patients in the nal-IRI + 5-FU group and 53% (44/83) in the 5-FU/LV group had evaluable data at 12 weeks. At baseline, median Global Health Status scores were near the midpoint of the scoring range, median Functional Scale scores were high, and Symptom Scale scores were low, with baseline values similar between groups. The observed median change in score at 12 weeks was 0 for both treatment groups for Global Health Status and for the following subscale scores: role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, social functioning, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties. For subscale scores for which the median change was not 0 (nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV: physical functioning and fatigue), the between-group differences were not substantial. Additionally, there were no significant differences in the proportion of patients classified as improved, worsened, or stable between the treatment groups. Across subscales, adjusted P values for the comparisons were >0.05 (NS).Conclusion: In NAPOLI-1, evaluable nal-IRI + 5-FU/LV-treated patients with data through 12 weeks tended to maintain baseline QoL over 12 weeks, and there were no significant differences versus the 5-FU/LV-treated patients in QoL response despite the addition of a second cytotoxic agent. These results are limited by the small number of patients and variability in QoL subscale scores.
    日期: 2016-06
    關聯: Annals of Oncology. 2016 Jun;27(Suppl. 2):119.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw198.04
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0923-7534&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000379756200387
    顯示於類別:[陳立宗] 會議論文/會議摘要

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 描述 大小格式瀏覽次數
    ISI000379756200387.pdf40KbAdobe PDF296檢視/開啟


    在NHRI中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.

    TAIR相關文章

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋