English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12145/12927 (94%)
Visitors : 857169      Online Users : 256
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/10497


    Title: Roles of ramR and tet(A) mutations in conferring tigecycline resistance in carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates
    Authors: Chiu, SK;Huang, LY;Chen, H;Tsai, YK;Liou, CH;Lin, JC;Siu, LK;Chang, FY;Yeh, KM
    Contributors: Division of Infectious Diseases
    Abstract: Tigecycline is regarded as a last-resort treatment for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections, but increasing numbers of tigecycline-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates have been reported. Tigecycline resistance mechanisms are underdetermined in CRKP. This study aimed to elucidate mechanisms underlying tigecycline resistance in 16 tigecycline- and carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (TCRKP) isolates. Mutations in tigecycline resistance determinant genes (ramR, acrR, oqxR, tet(A), tet(L), tet(X), tet(M), rpsJ) were assessed by PCR amplicon sequencing, and mutations in ramR and tet(A) exhibited high prevalences individually (81%) and in combination (63%). Eight functional ramR mutation profiles reducing tigecycline sensitivity were verified by plasmid complementation of wild-type and mutant ramR Using a site-specific mutant, the most frequent RamR mutation, A19V (60%), had no significant effect on tigecycline susceptibility and upregulation of ramA and acrA Two tet(A) variants with double frameshift mutations, Type 1 and Type 2, were identified; Type 2 tet(A) is novel. Parent strain transformed with a plasmid carrying Type 1 or Type 2 tet(A) increased tigecycline MIC by 8-fold or 4-fold, respectively. Synergistic effects were observed in strains harboring deficient ramR and mutated tet(A), with an 8-fold increase in tigecycline MIC compared with strains harboring only mutated tet(A). Overall, mutations in the ramR and tet(A) efflux genes constituted the major tigecycline resistance mechanisms among the studied TCRKP isolates. The identification of strains exhibiting the combination of deficient ramR and widespread mutated tet(A) is concerning due to the possible dissemination of increased tigecycline resistance in K. pneumoniae.
    Date: 2017-08
    Relation: Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2017 Aug;61(8):Article number e00391-17.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aac.00391-17
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=0066-4804&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:000406259400043
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85026376056
    Appears in Collections:[蕭樑基] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    PUB28533243.pdf219KbAdobe PDF338View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback