English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 12500/13673 (91%)
Visitors : 2551975      Online Users : 457
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ir.nhri.org.tw/handle/3990099045/15011


    Title: A randomised trial comparing drug-coated balloons and conventional balloons for the treatment of stent-graft stenosis in dialysis vascular access
    Authors: Hsieh, MY;Lin, PS;Liao, MT;Lin, L;Chen, TY;Boon, JC;Yang, TF;Wu, CC
    Contributors: Institute of Cellular and Systems Medicine
    Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Previous studies on arteriovenous fistulas have demonstrated the potential benefit of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in maintaining the patency of dialysis access. However, stenoses involving stent-grafts were excluded from these studies. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of DCBs in treating stent-graft stenosis. METHODS: This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomised controlled study. From March 2017 to April 2021, 40 patients with dysfunctional vascular access owing to stent-graft stenosis were randomised to treatment with a DCB or a conventional balloon. Clinical follow up was scheduled at 1, 3, and 6 months, and angiographic follow up was performed 6 months after the intervention. The primary outcome was angiographic late luminal loss at 6 months, and secondary outcomes included target lesion and access circuit primary patency at 6 months. RESULTS: Thirty-six participants completed follow up angiography. The DCB group had a superior mean late luminal loss at 6 months compared with the control group (1.82 mm ± 1.83 mm vs. 3.63 mm ± 1.08 mm, respectively, p = .001). All 40 patients completed clinical follow up. The DCB group had a superior 6-month target lesion primary patency compared with the control group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.23, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 - 0.71; p = .005). Additionally, the DCB group had a numerically higher 6-month access circuit primary patency rate than the control group, although the difference was not statistically significant (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.26 - 1.11, p = .095). CONCLUSION: Conventional balloon angioplasty is not durable in stent-graft stenosis treatment. Treatment with DCBs provides less angiographic late luminal loss and potentially superior primary patency of the target lesion than treatment with conventional balloons. [ClinicalTrials ID: NCT03360279.].
    Date: 2023-08
    Relation: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2023 Aug;66(2):253-260.
    Link to: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2023.05.028
    JIF/Ranking 2023: http://gateway.webofknowledge.com/gateway/Gateway.cgi?GWVersion=2&SrcAuth=NHRI&SrcApp=NHRI_IR&KeyISSN=1078-5884&DestApp=IC2JCR
    Cited Times(WOS): https://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001059000900001
    Cited Times(Scopus): https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85164376608
    Appears in Collections:[吳志成] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    PUB37209996.pdf945KbAdobe PDF161View/Open


    All items in NHRI are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    Related Items in TAIR

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback